Publication:
Differences in knee flexor and extensor force and kinematic variables in rural versus urban area female students in Romania

dc.contributor.authorPetre, Ioana Mădălina
dc.contributor.authorNobari, H.
dc.contributor.authorBoșcoianu, M.
dc.contributor.authorPelin, B.
dc.contributor.authorIonescu, A.
dc.contributor.authorPrieto Gonzalez, P.
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, R.
dc.contributor.authorOancea, B.
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-11T07:09:29Z
dc.date.issued2024-05-03
dc.description.abstractThe study aimed to identify and explain the typical differences in low-intensity high-volume resistance training (LIHV-RT) performances for major muscle groups between rural versus urban young female students to establish the relevant set of quantitative and qualitative resistance training parameters. The study sample included 46 recreational active female students at the Transilvania University of Brașov, (mean ± SD age, 20 ± 1 year; body mass, 60 ± 3 kg; height, 160 ± 4 cm) grouped urban vs. rural. The study used modified resistance exercise machines for the hamstring- and quadricep-group muscles, equipped with a dynamometer and sensors for identifying developed forces and accelerations. A number of 368 tests were performed, representing two attempts for each subject, for knee flexion and knee extension exercises, with two different loads. For the performance analysis some variables were considered: the maximum number of repetition until failure, maximum force developed, maximum acceleration, the duration of the set and the mean time per repetition. The maximum number of repetition to failure shows a significant higher value for rural than urban in case of knee flexion (d = 0.98 [0.32, 1.54] for load 1(L1) and d = 0.65 [0.03, 1.21] for load 2(L2)) and in case of knee extension (d = 1.89 [1.11, 2.48] for L1 and d = 1.67 [0.92, 2.25] for L2). The total duration of the sets shows a significant higher value for rural than urban in case of knee flexion (d = 0.84 [0.19, 1.39] for L2) and in case of knee extension (d = 1.46 [0.74, 2.03] for L1 and d = 1.56 [0.98, 2.14] for L2). Additionally we found differences in the quality of the relevant repetitions execution and in the impulse developed during the LIHV- MNRF sets. The study’s main finding was that there are differences in LIHVRT performances knee flexion and knee extension antagonistic exercises, between rural and urban female students. We concluded that the obtained results allow teachers to understand the optimal design of RT programs for the different groups of participants, in order to adapt their teaching techniques so that their final objectives are achieved, insisting on particular aspects of the theoretical or practical contents.
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.unitbv.ro/handle/123456789/859
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFrontiers - Frontiers in Physiology
dc.subjectload
dc.subjectpower
dc.subjectvelocity
dc.subjectstrength training
dc.subjectlower body
dc.subjectlow-intensity high-volume
dc.subjectimpulse
dc.subjectprogram design
dc.titleDifferences in knee flexor and extensor force and kinematic variables in rural versus urban area female students in Romania
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
1_Differences in knee flexor and extensor force.pdf
Size:
1.44 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.35 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description: