Titus Prescure

Abstract

Is the regulation of the concession of privately owned assets, along with the concession of public goods - that is currently the rule, at least in terms of existing regulation? Despite the fact that, after the entry into force of Emergency Ordinance 54/2006, the concession of private property ceased to represent a preference in the law-making process, the provisions of Law no. 50/1991 remained in force. As a result, doctrine and judicial practice have polarized, creating two diametrically opposed views. This analysis does not outline the purpose of alignment with one of the two interpretations. Therefore, without excluding any of the two variants, we are trying to bring pros and cons of land concessions in the private domain.